Comments on: Using validates_presence_of on a boolean field? Should use validates_inclusion_of! http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/ Personal blog of Theodore Nguyen-Cao Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:12:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Daryl Manning http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/comment-page-1/#comment-1437 Daryl Manning Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:04:39 +0000 http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/?p=191#comment-1437 Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you'd expect from validate_presence_of Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you'd expect from validate_presence_of

]]> By: Daryl Manning http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/comment-page-1/#comment-1428 Daryl Manning Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:04:39 +0000 http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/?p=191#comment-1428 Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you'd expect from validate_presence_of Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you'd expect from validate_presence_of

]]>