<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using validates_presence_of on a boolean field? Should use validates_inclusion_of!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/</link>
	<description>Personal blog of Theodore Nguyen-Cao</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooboo</title>
		<link>http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/comment-page-1/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>shooboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/?p=191#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>Thank you. I&#039;ve been fighting the error for a couple of hours, now found your solution, works like a charm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I&#8217;ve been fighting the error for a couple of hours, now found your solution, works like a charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/comment-page-1/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/?p=191#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you&#039;d expect from validate_presence_of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you&#39;d expect from validate_presence_of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/2009/01/12/using-validates_presence_of-on-a-boolean-field-should-use-validates_inclusion_of/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theodorenguyen-cao.com/?p=191#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you&#039;d expect from validate_presence_of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that ! I was wondering why that kept throwing a validation warning. definitely not the behaviour you&#39;d expect from validate_presence_of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

